<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: At Dalston Lane	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://spitalfieldslife.com/2014/02/24/at-dalston-lane/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://spitalfieldslife.com/2014/02/24/at-dalston-lane/</link>
	<description>In the midst of life I woke to find myself living in an old house beside Brick Lane in the East End of London</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2014 16:27:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Frankie		</title>
		<link>https://spitalfieldslife.com/2014/02/24/at-dalston-lane/#comment-254207</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frankie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2014 19:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spitalfieldslife.com/?p=108325#comment-254207</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well said, Marcus. Have any of the other posters read the survey reports in the planning application before making kneejerk responses? The planners have actually looked at all of the options for propping up the fronts etc but it is all too late - not possible to prop the facade (not even straight any more so can&#039;t fit joists to support it) or even reuse the bricks which have become porous. But they are going to remove columns, reveals, architraves and anything else that can be stored and reused, and are going to preserve 2 of the shops before rebuilding. How much of our money should councils spend to preserve a few ruined Georgian shops (which may have been lovely once upon a time)? The outraged comments should have been made 30 years ago or even earlier when it might have been possible to salvage something.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, Marcus. Have any of the other posters read the survey reports in the planning application before making kneejerk responses? The planners have actually looked at all of the options for propping up the fronts etc but it is all too late &#8211; not possible to prop the facade (not even straight any more so can&#8217;t fit joists to support it) or even reuse the bricks which have become porous. But they are going to remove columns, reveals, architraves and anything else that can be stored and reused, and are going to preserve 2 of the shops before rebuilding. How much of our money should councils spend to preserve a few ruined Georgian shops (which may have been lovely once upon a time)? The outraged comments should have been made 30 years ago or even earlier when it might have been possible to salvage something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Marcus Salisbury		</title>
		<link>https://spitalfieldslife.com/2014/02/24/at-dalston-lane/#comment-253728</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marcus Salisbury]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 23:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spitalfieldslife.com/?p=108325#comment-253728</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I currently think this  campaign is the equivalent of breaking into a battery farm to save one chicken, one half dead chicken. Faced with the cost of saving these features I think 99% of the population would baulk. Its fine to point the finger and say its a disgrace but if you owned these properties would you take a deep breath and say &quot;ok..heres the cheque&quot; to have it done right if it was coming from your pocket? The features that are still in evidence I would wager have survived simply because tennants couldnt afford to rip them out, if you want to talk about &quot;vandalism&quot; look at the god awful business signage thats been slapped up over the years, yes the earlier stuff is great but the qualities declined as times gone on at a steady pace. Someone should have intervened long ago these are just to far gone now. shop owners dont spend the money on commercial properties because its not &quot;theirs&quot;   it wouldnt occur to them just to do it to keep the area looking good or to improve their own working environment..However you restore or dont these premises as soon as theyre done the occupants will go right back to cutting corners.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I currently think this  campaign is the equivalent of breaking into a battery farm to save one chicken, one half dead chicken. Faced with the cost of saving these features I think 99% of the population would baulk. Its fine to point the finger and say its a disgrace but if you owned these properties would you take a deep breath and say &#8220;ok..heres the cheque&#8221; to have it done right if it was coming from your pocket? The features that are still in evidence I would wager have survived simply because tennants couldnt afford to rip them out, if you want to talk about &#8220;vandalism&#8221; look at the god awful business signage thats been slapped up over the years, yes the earlier stuff is great but the qualities declined as times gone on at a steady pace. Someone should have intervened long ago these are just to far gone now. shop owners dont spend the money on commercial properties because its not &#8220;theirs&#8221;   it wouldnt occur to them just to do it to keep the area looking good or to improve their own working environment..However you restore or dont these premises as soon as theyre done the occupants will go right back to cutting corners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gina		</title>
		<link>https://spitalfieldslife.com/2014/02/24/at-dalston-lane/#comment-253669</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gina]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 19:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spitalfieldslife.com/?p=108325#comment-253669</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is madness. To know these buildings are worth giving a conservation area designation and then allow them to be ripped down is crazy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is madness. To know these buildings are worth giving a conservation area designation and then allow them to be ripped down is crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gary Cook		</title>
		<link>https://spitalfieldslife.com/2014/02/24/at-dalston-lane/#comment-253326</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Cook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spitalfieldslife.com/?p=108325#comment-253326</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I do object strongly to the east end&#039;s rampant destruction by developers and planners of late. I also object to the seemingly underhand and cavalier nature of the Dalston Lane development. 

I can&#039;t, however, see that this particular development is a huge loss. If you look at other property that has been converted on the same street, it is inevitable that money is going to take over, at least until it gets down to the Graham Rd crossroads. You can&#039;t park in front of these shops and the whole run has been in serious decline for years.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do object strongly to the east end&#8217;s rampant destruction by developers and planners of late. I also object to the seemingly underhand and cavalier nature of the Dalston Lane development. </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t, however, see that this particular development is a huge loss. If you look at other property that has been converted on the same street, it is inevitable that money is going to take over, at least until it gets down to the Graham Rd crossroads. You can&#8217;t park in front of these shops and the whole run has been in serious decline for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Tingey		</title>
		<link>https://spitalfieldslife.com/2014/02/24/at-dalston-lane/#comment-252112</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Tingey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 07:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spitalfieldslife.com/?p=108325#comment-252112</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[And ...
Vicky A
Sorry, but Labour are just as bad.
The so-called &quot;Loakes tour of destruction&quot; in Waltham Forest (named after a councillor) saw the attempted permanent closures of both the Vestry Hoose Museum &#038; the &quot;Water House&quot;, a.k.a. William Morris Gallery]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And &#8230;<br />
Vicky A<br />
Sorry, but Labour are just as bad.<br />
The so-called &#8220;Loakes tour of destruction&#8221; in Waltham Forest (named after a councillor) saw the attempted permanent closures of both the Vestry Hoose Museum &amp; the &#8220;Water House&#8221;, a.k.a. William Morris Gallery</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Tingey		</title>
		<link>https://spitalfieldslife.com/2014/02/24/at-dalston-lane/#comment-252110</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Tingey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 07:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spitalfieldslife.com/?p=108325#comment-252110</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[gary
It you think Hackney are bad, try ... Waltham Forest
Or (whisper it) even worse ... Tower Hamlets]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gary<br />
It you think Hackney are bad, try &#8230; Waltham Forest<br />
Or (whisper it) even worse &#8230; Tower Hamlets</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Grace		</title>
		<link>https://spitalfieldslife.com/2014/02/24/at-dalston-lane/#comment-252098</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 06:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spitalfieldslife.com/?p=108325#comment-252098</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My letter to Hackney Council regarding Dalston Lane:

&quot;As a resident in nearby **** Road, I oppose the demolition of the buildings on this site. The proposed development should include affordable housing as a necessity. It should not be pricing locals out of the market: those people who can no longer be with their extended families as a result of the inequality in housing value. In terms of the aesthetic value of the proposed design of this site - there is none. This is, I understand, an emotive subject and one that does not always allow room for an expression of feeling towards the built environment in such cases. However, it is an important consideration when thinking about the relationship the community have with Hackney&#039;s rich heritage. Where possible, elements of the Georgian buildings should be retained. Of course everyone&#039;s idea of what is aesthetically pleasing differs, and I am far from suggesting that the site should remain the way it is. But the proposal for the site does not have a sense of longevity about it. In the fight for this development many will argue nostalgically and perhaps even romanticise the past. Please look kindly on such arguments as there is heritage-value in this site. Character is important to the people of Hackney and far too many buildings have gone that should have been saved. Don&#039;t make the same mistake again. In order to move forward, sometimes we must look back. In this case, a connection with elements of the past in the midst of a society that is being dwarfed by high-rise development would help to ground and revive a sense of community on Dalston Lane. I want to love the Lane again and be proud to live in a Borough that takes its conservation commitments seriously. I urge you to bring back the character and soul to this area.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My letter to Hackney Council regarding Dalston Lane:</p>
<p>&#8220;As a resident in nearby **** Road, I oppose the demolition of the buildings on this site. The proposed development should include affordable housing as a necessity. It should not be pricing locals out of the market: those people who can no longer be with their extended families as a result of the inequality in housing value. In terms of the aesthetic value of the proposed design of this site &#8211; there is none. This is, I understand, an emotive subject and one that does not always allow room for an expression of feeling towards the built environment in such cases. However, it is an important consideration when thinking about the relationship the community have with Hackney&#8217;s rich heritage. Where possible, elements of the Georgian buildings should be retained. Of course everyone&#8217;s idea of what is aesthetically pleasing differs, and I am far from suggesting that the site should remain the way it is. But the proposal for the site does not have a sense of longevity about it. In the fight for this development many will argue nostalgically and perhaps even romanticise the past. Please look kindly on such arguments as there is heritage-value in this site. Character is important to the people of Hackney and far too many buildings have gone that should have been saved. Don&#8217;t make the same mistake again. In order to move forward, sometimes we must look back. In this case, a connection with elements of the past in the midst of a society that is being dwarfed by high-rise development would help to ground and revive a sense of community on Dalston Lane. I want to love the Lane again and be proud to live in a Borough that takes its conservation commitments seriously. I urge you to bring back the character and soul to this area.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris Ashby		</title>
		<link>https://spitalfieldslife.com/2014/02/24/at-dalston-lane/#comment-251967</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Ashby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 20:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spitalfieldslife.com/?p=108325#comment-251967</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Objected to the objectionable online. Thanks for the alert. 
Chris A.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Objected to the objectionable online. Thanks for the alert.<br />
Chris A.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bruce Eadie		</title>
		<link>https://spitalfieldslife.com/2014/02/24/at-dalston-lane/#comment-251964</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Eadie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 20:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spitalfieldslife.com/?p=108325#comment-251964</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Vicky A,

There is a very long history of the council&#039;s failure of care for this terrace. I don&#039;t blame any single council officer, but over the years a mixture of incompetence, neglect and some very dodgey deals with private landowners has brought this terrace to its knees. The structure is not sound because of the council&#039;s pathetic inability to fulfil its duties.

I suggest you and look at Mile End Road between the Whitechapel Gallery and Brick Lane to see what a council can do with a street scape if it has a will or any residue of talent.

Bruce]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vicky A,</p>
<p>There is a very long history of the council&#8217;s failure of care for this terrace. I don&#8217;t blame any single council officer, but over the years a mixture of incompetence, neglect and some very dodgey deals with private landowners has brought this terrace to its knees. The structure is not sound because of the council&#8217;s pathetic inability to fulfil its duties.</p>
<p>I suggest you and look at Mile End Road between the Whitechapel Gallery and Brick Lane to see what a council can do with a street scape if it has a will or any residue of talent.</p>
<p>Bruce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: James		</title>
		<link>https://spitalfieldslife.com/2014/02/24/at-dalston-lane/#comment-251963</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 20:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spitalfieldslife.com/?p=108325#comment-251963</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The vandalism in Dalston lane started long ago under the guise of regeneration/conservation when we lost the historic 4 Aces club, Bob Marley, Desmond Decker, Ben E King, The Ronetts, Stevie Wonder, Jimmy Cliff and many more all played small packed gigs there........ Not to mention numerous club nights over several decades that drew people from hundreds of miles around right up until The Labyrinth residency in the 90&#039;s.  What a tragic lose of heritage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The vandalism in Dalston lane started long ago under the guise of regeneration/conservation when we lost the historic 4 Aces club, Bob Marley, Desmond Decker, Ben E King, The Ronetts, Stevie Wonder, Jimmy Cliff and many more all played small packed gigs there&#8230;&#8230;.. Not to mention numerous club nights over several decades that drew people from hundreds of miles around right up until The Labyrinth residency in the 90&#8217;s.  What a tragic lose of heritage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
